Featured Cases
Woke Corporations
Jeff Vaughn v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., et al.
AFL’s client, Jeff Vaughn, is an Emmy Award-winning white male with over 30 years of experience in broadcas...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
Woke Corporations
Wood v. Red Hat, Inc.
AFL’s client, a white male, was a Senior Director at Red Hat, a subsidiary of the International Business Ma...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
Title IX
Texas, et al. v. U.S.
The Biden Administration’s new Title IX rule puts women and girls at risk on college campuses and in K-12 s...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
DEI
Brian Beneker v. CBS Studios, Inc., et al.
Brian Beneker is a white, heterosexual male script coordinator and freelance scriptwriter who has consisten...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
Higher Education
Scott Gerber v. Ohio Northern University, et al.
Dr. Scott Gerber, a tenured professor at Ohio Northern University, was removed from his classroom in the pr...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
Woke Corporations
Brian Craig v. Target Corporation, et al.
Target Corporation and its Board of Directors have misled shareholders and customers with misleading repres...
Status: Ongoing
Read More
All Cases
Woke Corporations
National Center for Public Policy Research, et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission (Kroger)
Kroger’s Board of Directors adopted The Kroger Co. Policy on Business Ethics, which commits Kroger “to a policy of equal opportunity for all associates without regard to race, color, reli...
Government Oversight
AFL v. Kerner
AFL requested through FOIA that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Division provide all email communications between its employees and the Legal Director at the American Civil Libert...
Second Amendment
Cargill v. ATF
ATF is attempting to reduce Americans’ access to firearms by revoking federal firearms licenses (FFL), the license required to run a gun store, for minor paperwork errors. The ATF has beg...
Parental Rights
Brandl, et al. v. West Shore School District
The West Shore School District’s Social Emotion Learning curriculum teaches children “virtues and values” that go against the beliefs of Christian parents in the school district. The pare...
Woke Corporations
Bolduc v. Amazon
Under the guise of “diversity,” Amazon is offering a $10,000 bonus to its delivery service partners — but only for those partners who are black, Latino, or Native American. Asian American...
Parental Rights
AFL, et al. v. Cardona, et al.
The Biden Administration’s Department of Education created a “National Parents and Families Engagement Council” to serve as a partisan, hand-selected committee to mask the Biden Administr...
Discrimination
Braidwood Management, Inc. v. EEOC
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued an edict claiming that Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, with no exceptions ...
Government Oversight
Braidwood Management v. Becerra
Former President Barack Obama and his allies in Congress created section 2713 of the Affordable Care Act, which empowered the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (“PSTF”) to decide the “p...
Government Oversight
Spicer v. Biden
In 2020, President Trump lawfully appointed Sean Spicer and Russ Vought to serve three year terms on the Board of Visitors for the Naval Academy. In an unprecedented move, the Biden Admin...
Parental Rights
Sargent, et al. v. School District of Philadelphia, et al.
In 2021, in the name of “antiracism” and “equity,” the School District of Philadelphia announced that starting with the 2022–23 school year, it was changing its selection process for crit...
Parental Rights
Thomas, et al. v. Loudoun County Public Schools
Loudoun County Public Schools adopted Regulation 8040, which prohibits school staff from talking to parents about any issue related to the “gender identity” of their children, unless the ...
Government Oversight
Neese v. Becerra
The Department of Health and Human Services issued an edict that interpreted section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act as prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender id...
Immigration
Texas v. Walensky, et al. (Title 42 case)
The Trump Administration had used 42 U.S.C. § 265 (Title 42) to immediately expel over 1 million illegal border crossers during the COVID Pandemic Health Emergency. The Biden Administrati...
Immigration
Texas v. Biden
The Federal government violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), the Public Health Service Act of 1944 (“PHSA”), and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) by abandoning pre...
Immigration
Texas, et al. v. DHS et al. (CHNV Parole case)
Under the guise of preventing illegal aliens from crossing the southern land border, the Biden Administration created a new blatantly unlawful program that will permit up to 360,000 alien...
Government Oversight
Texas, et al. v. HHS, et al. (WHO case)
On January 19, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule, which, in effect, empowers the World Health Organization (WHO) to make decisions about the exis...
Immigration
Texas, et al. v. Biden, et al.
The Biden Administration created a program named the “Central American Minors Program,” or “CAM,” for illegal aliens from El Salvador, Guatemala, or Honduras to petition the federal gover...
Immigration
Texas v. Mayorkas, et al.
The Biden Administration has released millions of illegal aliens into the United States. On March 29, 2022, the Administration promulgated an Interim Final Rule to release even more illeg...
Government Oversight
Vierbuchen v. Biden
The Biden Administration issued an Executive Order requiring all executive branch employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine or face termination. AFL brought suit on behalf of a federal employ...
Government Oversight
Payne v. Biden
The Biden Administration issued an Executive Order requiring all executive branch employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine or face termination. AFL sued on behalf of a federal employee to pr...
Discrimination
Jacobson v. Bassett
The State of New York implemented a policy that rationed COVID-19 treatment based on the patient’s race rather than their medical need.
Parental Rights
Auslander v. Tredyffrin/Easttown
Ben Auslander, a father, tried to review his child’s school district’s curriculum, which included divisive CRT instructional materials. Initially, the school district allowed him to inspe...
Discrimination
Miller v. Vilsack – Biden Administration Farm Loan Forgiveness Program
Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act created a program that permitted the U.S. Department of Agriculture to provide loan forgiveness to farmers and ranchers with USDA-backed loans...
Discrimination
John Doe v. New York University
Despite federal law prohibiting universities that receive federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race and sex, the New York University (NYU) Law Review selects members and ed...
